Search for: All records

The ground thermal regime has a profound impact on geomorphological processes and has been suggested to be particularly important for weathering processes in periglacial environments. Several frost-related damage indices have hitherto been developed to link climate and frost weathering potential in bedrock, although only for individual points or grid cells. Here, we model ground temperature and frost weathering potential in steep rock walls in the Jotunheimen Mountains, southern Norway, along a two-dimensional profile line for the Younger Dryas Stadial-Preboreal transition (c. 11.5 ka), the Holocene Thermal Maximum (c. 7.5 ka), the Little Ice Age (1750), and the 2010s. We use an established heat flow model and frost-cracking index based on the ice segregation theory. A central innovation of our model treatment is the implementation of ensemble simulations using distributions of automatically mapped crack radii in a rock wall, whereas previous frost damage models considered only a single characteristic crack radius. Our results allowed for the identification of sites with enhanced frost weathering. Such sites are typically found between rock walls and retreating glaciers, as well as in areas where snow depth changes abruptly, resulting in large thermal gradients. Hence, frost weathering may be highly active during glacier retreat, enhancing the damage to rock walls during deglaciation by adding to the damage from stress release. The coldest climates of the Younger Dryas Stadial-Preboreal transition and the Little Ice Age were generally most favorable for frost cracking. Such timing compares well with the knowledge about the timing of rockfall accumulations in Norway. 

ABSTRACT Research in geocryology is currently principally concerned with the effects of climate change on permafrost terrain. The motivations for most of the research are (1) quantification of the anticipated net emissions of CO₂and CH₄from warming and thaw of near‐surface permafrost and (2) mitigation of effects on infrastructure of such warming and thaw. Some of the effects, such as increases in ground temperature or active‐layer thickness, have been observed for several decades. Landforms that are sensitive to creep deformation are moving more quickly as a result, andRock Glacier Velocityis now part of the Essential Climate VariablePermafrostof the Global Climate Observing System. Other effects, for example, the occurrence of physical disturbances associated with thawing permafrost, particularly the development of thaw slumps, have noticeably increased since 2010. Still, others, such as erosion of sedimentary permafrost coasts, have accelerated. Geochemical effects in groundwater from trace elements, including contaminants, and those that issue from the release of sediment particles during mass wasting have become evident since 2020. Net release of CO₂and CH₄from thawing permafrost is anticipated within two decades and, worldwide, may reach emissions that are equivalent to a large industrial economy. The most immediate local concerns are for waste disposal pits that were constructed on the premise that permafrost would be an effective and permanent containment medium. This assumption is no longer valid at many contaminated sites. The role of ground ice in conditioning responses to changes in the thermal or hydrological regimes of permafrost has re‐emphasized the importance of regional conditions, particularly landscape history, when applying research results to practical problems. 

Climate change is destabilizing permafrost landscapes, affecting infrastructure, ecosystems, and human livelihoods. The rate of permafrost thaw is controlled by surface and subsurface properties and processes, all of which are potentially linked with each other. However, no standardized protocol exists for measuring permafrost thaw and related processes and properties in a linked manner. The permafrost thaw action group of the Terrestrial Multidisciplinary distributed Observatories for the Study of the Arctic Connections (T-MOSAiC) project has developed a protocol, for use by non-specialist scientists and technicians, citizen scientists, and indigenous groups, to collect standardized metadata and data on permafrost thaw. The protocol introduced here addresses the need to jointly measure permafrost thaw and the associated surface and subsurface environmental conditions. The parameters measured along transects include: snow depth, thaw depth, vegetation height, soil texture, and water level. The metadata collection includes data on timing of data collection, geographical coordinates, land surface characteristics (vegetation, ground surface, water conditions), as well as photographs. Our hope is that this openly available dataset will also be highly valuable for validation and parameterization of numerical and conceptual models, and thus to the broad community represented by the T-MOSAiC project. 

Abstract. Peatlands have often been neglected in Earth system models (ESMs).Where they are included, they are usually represented via a separate, prescribed grid cell fraction that is given the physical characteristics of a peat (highly organic) soil. However, in reality soils vary on a spectrum between purely mineral soil (no organic material) and purely organicsoil, typically with an organic layer of variable thickness overlying mineral soil below. They are also dynamic, with organic layer thickness and its properties changing over time. Neither the spectrumof soil types nor their dynamic nature can be captured by current ESMs. Here we present a new version of an ESM land surface scheme (Joint UK Land Environment Simulator, JULES) where soil organic matter accumulation – and thus peatland formation, degradation and stability – is integratedin the vertically resolved soil carbon scheme. We also introduce the capacity to track soil carbon age as a function of depth in JULES and compare this to measured peat age–depth profiles. The new scheme is tested and evaluated at northern and temperate sites. This scheme simulates dynamic feedbacks between the soil organic material and its thermal and hydraulic characteristics. We show that draining the peatlands can lead to significant carbon loss, soil compaction and changes in peat properties. However, negative feedbacks can lead to the potential for peatlands to rewet themselves following drainage.These ecohydrological feedbacks can also lead to peatlands maintaining themselves in climates where peat formation would not otherwise initiate in the model, i.e. displaying some degree of resilience. The new model produces similar results to the original model for mineral soils and realistic profiles of soil organic carbon for peatlands.We evaluate the model against typical peat profiles based on 216 northern and temperate sites from a global dataset of peat cores.The root-mean-squared error (RMSE) in the soil carbon profile is reduced by 35 %–80 % in the best-performing JULES-Peat simulationscompared with the standard JULES configuration. The RMSE in these JULES-Peat simulations is 7.7–16.7 kg C m−3 depending on climate zone, which is considerably smaller than the soil carbon itself (around 30–60 kg C m−3). The RMSE at mineral soil sites is also reducedin JULES-Peat compared with the original JULES configuration (reduced by ∼ 30 %–50 %). Thus, JULES-Peat can be used as a complete scheme that simulates both organic and mineral soils. It does not requireany additional input data and introduces minimal additional variables to the model. This provides a new approach for improving the simulation of organic and peatland soils andassociated carbon-cycle feedbacks in ESMs. 

Abstract. Infrastructure built on perennially frozen ice-richground relies heavily on thermally stable subsurface conditions. Climate-warming-induced deepening of ground thaw puts such infrastructure at risk offailure. For better assessing the risk of large-scale future damage to Arcticinfrastructure, improved strategies for model-based approaches are urgentlyneeded. We used the laterally coupled 1D heat conduction model CryoGrid3to simulate permafrost degradation affected by linear infrastructure. Wepresent a case study of a gravel road built on continuous permafrost (Daltonhighway, Alaska) and forced our model under historical and strong futurewarming conditions (following the RCP8.5 scenario). As expected, the presenceof a gravel road in the model leads to higher net heat flux entering theground compared to a reference run without infrastructure and thus a higherrate of thaw. Further, our results suggest that road failure is likely aconsequence of lateral destabilisation due to talik formation in the groundbeside the road rather than a direct consequence of a top-down thawing anddeepening of the active layer below the road centre. In line with previousstudies, we identify enhanced snow accumulation and ponding (both aconsequence of infrastructure presence) as key factors for increased soiltemperatures and road degradation. Using differing horizontal modelresolutions we show that it is possible to capture these key factors and theirimpact on thawing dynamics with a low number of lateral model units,underlining the potential of our model approach for use in pan-Arctic riskassessments. Our results suggest a general two-phase behaviour of permafrost degradation:an initial phase of slow and gradual thaw, followed by a strong increase inthawing rates after the exceedance of a critical ground warming. The timing ofthis transition and the magnitude of thaw rate acceleration differ stronglybetween undisturbed tundra and infrastructure-affected permafrost ground. Ourmodel results suggest that current model-based approaches which do notexplicitly take into account infrastructure in their designs are likely tostrongly underestimate the timing of future Arctic infrastructure failure. By using a laterally coupled 1D model to simulate linearinfrastructure, we infer results in line with outcomes from more complex 2Dand 3D models, but our model's computational efficiency allows us to accountfor long-term climate change impacts on infrastructure from permafrostdegradation. Our model simulations underline that it is crucial to considerclimate warming when planning and constructing infrastructure on permafrost asa transition from a stable to a highly unstable state can well occur withinthe service lifetime (about 30 years) of such a construction. Such atransition can even be triggered in the coming decade by climate change forinfrastructure built on high northern latitude continuous permafrost thatdisplays cold and relatively stable conditions today. 

Abstract Significant progress in permafrost carbon science made over the past decades include the identification of vast permafrost carbon stocks, the development of new pan‐Arctic permafrost maps, an increase in terrestrial measurement sites for CO₂and methane fluxes, and important factors affecting carbon cycling, including vegetation changes, periods of soil freezing and thawing, wildfire, and other disturbance events. Process‐based modeling studies now include key elements of permafrost carbon cycling and advances in statistical modeling and inverse modeling enhance understanding of permafrost region C budgets. By combining existing data syntheses and model outputs, the permafrost region is likely a wetland methane source and small terrestrial ecosystem CO₂sink with lower net CO₂uptake toward higher latitudes, excluding wildfire emissions. For 2002–2014, the strongest CO₂sink was located in western Canada (median: −52 g C m⁻² y⁻¹) and smallest sinks in Alaska, Canadian tundra, and Siberian tundra (medians: −5 to −9 g C m⁻² y⁻¹). Eurasian regions had the largest median wetland methane fluxes (16–18 g CH₄m⁻² y⁻¹). Quantifying the regional scale carbon balance remains challenging because of high spatial and temporal variability and relatively low density of observations. More accurate permafrost region carbon fluxes require: (a) the development of better maps characterizing wetlands and dynamics of vegetation and disturbances, including abrupt permafrost thaw; (b) the establishment of new year‐round CO₂and methane flux sites in underrepresented areas; and (c) improved models that better represent important permafrost carbon cycle dynamics, including non‐growing season emissions and disturbance effects.